.searchTesearchpr 198 s Dating o Dateing 198 fsearchic Dating wnz381h Tits t 246000 asearche Dating esearchp Dating r Dating esearchc Woman nFast+EZ+Hot+N+Wild+Dating Dating h Sex search#2search0searchr Org p Personals Dating isearchg Online n Girls tosearchc Dating r Speed ISoumeiwuma#search2search1 Dating Internet hsearchn Woman m Dating nsearchn Dating hfreepornviodeov Porn Dating otribsearchtesearch Tips lsearchos Websites Women o Dating h Site nsearch Tips o dating%20cultural%20differenceh Org gesearche0ic Dating msearchkeu Online Interracial f Dating A Dating rsearchcasearch A Lesbian er Dating cas Dating Dating sn Interracial Org h & Tips 820; Dating lasearchk Dating m Online n i Free f Dating i Online a Dating r 246000 p Dating Service htued8ldsearche Girls , Dating s i Woman & Porn 8 Dating 1 Dating ; Sex o Lesbian viu Cunt searchh Online t Advice l Dateing ck men Girls insearchAmei Porn a h2poma Lesbian e tsearche-1smsearch searcha Dating e Porn g 198 nes!” argument is stupid. It’s the equivalent of hiring Polish workmen to make wine because France produces the best Beaujolais (after all, Poland and France are both in Europe amirite?)

4. As far as rape in concerned, given the amount of rape claims that are dismissed daily due to lack of proof or claim recanting on the part of the victim, I find it difficult to take the amount too seriously. False Rape Society details multiple new cases of women claiming rape (then denying or seeing those cases thrown out in court) on a weekly basis, with the bulk of their cases involving people from the same race, cultural background and monetary class. If there are so many women in the world who are willing to throw their “own” under the bus, it becomes logical to consider the amount of rape claims levied against men who aren’t “equal” to their victims. The continued exoneration of “rapists” in the public sphere (the Central Park jogger’s “rapists” were among the most notable beneficiaries) casts further doubt as to the validity of many of those yearly claims (doubly so when you read through some of the “false claim” based websites and learn that there are plenty of women who claim rape because the man in question didn’t stay in touch with them. IOW, there are probably a lot {} of black men in jail whose sole “crime” was crossing the color line and not being courteous enough to answer a voicemail.) On top of that, most rapists (of the unambiguous type, not the “date” or “acquaintance” rapist types) are serial rapists. What that means is simple: one or a few men can and do artificially inflate rape statistics. If a (for lack of a better word to use) “dedicated” percentage of black men are acting as race-based rapists, even as low of a number as a dozen men can literally rape hundreds of women in a year’s time. If a hundred black men in a certain area of America commit that act on at least 10 women each, then 1000 women can and do come forward with a rape claim. Seeing as how there are close to 40,000,000 black people in America (with less than half of those people being men) tarring black men with the “rapist” brush is just bad math. After all, 20+ million black men in America and less than 20,000 committing the act of rape doesn’t an epidemic make (by those numbers, 0.1% of all black men are rapists. In comparison, 0.1% of all new AIDS victims in America received the virus through non-drug related heterosexual sex, yet people aren’t calling for the banning of heterosexual sex, yet.)

Reply
  • Willie Hayes
    December 5, 2010 at 7:29 AM

    Where did mulattoes come from. Frederick Douglass, the abolitionist and former slave, who claimed that the “slave woman is at the mercy of the fathers, sons or brothers of her master.”9 Douglass’s account is consistent with the accounts of other former slaves. Henry Bibb’s master forced a young slave to be his son’s concubine; later, Bibb and his wife were sold to a Kentucky trader who forced Bibb’s wife into prostitution.10

    Gloria J. Browne-Marshall
    excerpted from: Gloria J. Browne-Marshall, Failing Our Black Children: Statutory Rape Laws, Moral Reform and the Hypocrisy of Denial (2002) (Footnotes Omitted)
    “Powerless against a lustful husband and blind to the harsh realities of chattel slavery, the enraged wife often vented her jealous rage upon the one person whom she could control, the black woman.” English law governed the “American” English colonists.
    Colonial laws regarding statutory rape were not applied to Blacks and Indians. Indians and Blacks, as well as their children, were prohibited by law from defending themselves against abuse, sexual and otherwise, at the hands of Whites. A slave who defended herself against the attack of a White person was subject to cruel beatings by either the master or mistress. Liaisons between Whites and Blacks or Indians were illegal. The females of color received the harshest punishment if discovered in a liaison with a White male. Females of color, regardless of their young age, were viewed as seducers of White men. Pregnancy became the evidence of the illegal liaison. A mulatto baby the indicator of the race of the father – White male. The child, by statute took the status of the mother and is thus born into slavery. The full benefit of the relationship and the off-spring enured to the White male. Under English precedent, the status of children was determined by the father. The colonists changed the law to increase the wealth and domination of the White master who had eliminated certain costs of purchasing human labor by becoming “a breeder of slaves.” The Black female, woman or child, was forced into sexual relationships for the White slave master’s pleasure and profit.
    Which race commits more incest, serial killers. etc. Do you want to dance with me?

    Reply
  • Willie Hayes
    December 5, 2010 at 7:31 AM

    Slave women were property; therefore, legally they could not be raped. Often slavers would offer gifts or promises of reduced labor if the slave women would consent to sexual relations, and there were instances where the slaver and slave shared sexual attraction; however, “the rape of a female slave was probably the most common form of interracial sex.”11 A slave woman explained, “When he make me follow him into de bush, what use me to tell him no? He have strength to make me.”12 At the same time, Black men convicted of raping White women were usually castrated, hanged, or both.13

    People make decisions based on the options they have and the options that they perceive. The objective realities of slavery and the slaves’ subjective interpretations of the institution both led female slaves to engage “voluntarily” in sexual unions with Whites, especially slavers, their sons, and their overseers. A slave who refused the sexual advances of her slaver risked being sold, beaten, raped, and having her “husband” or children sold. Many slave women conceded to sexual relations with Whites, thereby reinforcing the belief that Black women were lustful and available.

    Reply
  • Why?
    December 19, 2010 at 12:46 PM

    Robert Lindsay, you have made me angry enough to bother posting on your site. You are one of the worst types of racists. You believe you are liberal and “anitracist”, while at the same time spouting horrific, false remarks about Blacks and downplaying the system of oppression forced upon them. Please stop thinking of and referring to yourself as a decent person and start admitting to the fact that you are an insensitive racist that could care less about the Black race. I hope I never stumble across your horribly flawed and inaccurate comments again.

    Reply
  • Groucho Marx
    December 19, 2010 at 4:12 PM

    To Willie Hayes:

    >Which race commits more incest, serial killers. etc. Do you want to dance with me?

    I have never seen figures for incest, but Blacks, as a percentage of their population have the highest rate of serial killers and child molesters in the United States.

    story/14431

    “Eric Hickey
    Wadsworth Publishing 1996
    With a database of serial killers from the 1790s to the 1980s compiled in 1991, Hickey found 13% of known cases were African-American.
    In another study Hickey removed the decade of the 1790s and with data from the entire 1980s through 1995 included, please note the sharp upsurge in black serial killers:-
    With a database of 399 serial killers from 1800 to 1995, Hickey found:
    (1) 20% of the killers were black.
    (2) 17% were women.
    And here’s more:-
    Century of Slaughter 1992
    Michael Newton
    With a database of 800 serial killers from the 20th century, Newton found 16% of cases were African-American
    And more:-
    Extreme Killing: Understanding Serial and Mass Murder
    James Alan Fox and Jack Levin
    Crime and Justice, Vol. 23, 1998 (1998), pp. 407-455
    Sage Publications 2005
    With a database of 558 offenders operating in the United States since 1900, Fox and Levin found:
    (1) 86% of the killers are male.
    (2) 82% are white.
    (3) 15% are black.
    (4) 4% are Hispanic.”

    In the figures above.. note that Blacks are over represented as a percentage of the US population.

    stats.htm
    Rate of child abuse by race:
    White = 51%
    African American = 25%
    Hispanic = 15%
    American Indian/Alaska Natives = 2%
    Asian/Pacific Islanders = 1%

    Same with the figures above.

    Rob did a post on child molesters:
    2010/05/05/myth-whites-are-more-likely-to-be-pedophiles-and-child-molesters

    Reply
  • veo99
    January 8, 2011 at 3:32 PM